How can freight transport and logistics firms navigate rising FX challenges?
Amongst the growing number of challenges facing freight transport and logistics firms is the threat of adverse currency movements.
5 April 2023
Best execution is one of the most commonly used terms across financial markets. Many believe that it just refers to pricing, but as recent events in the banking industry demonstrate, there are other important considerations that you shouldn’t take for granted.
When assessing the overall FX execution quality and execution governance in the context of best execution, it is important to consider a wide range of execution factors to determine the optimal execution arrangements that can help a firm achieve a best execution on a continuous basis.
It is widely known that execution prices and costs are probably the most important execution factors in a normal market environment.
We believe firms should seek to achieve competitive execution prices and transparent cost structure. They can do this by adopting a multi-bank FX execution platform where multiple liquidity providers are competing to provide exchanges rates. This enables them to transparently compare and execute FX rates from multiple providers. The execution prices and costs can be accessed and monitored via an independent Transaction Cost Analysis (TCA) to demonstrate best execution.
However, as the recent events with Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse illustrate, other execution factors beyond pricing and costs can play a significant role.
For instance, the likelihood of settlement typically becomes the crucial execution factor when counterparty risk dominates the market. As a result, selecting and performing appropriate due diligence on counterparties become an integral part of the best execution and firms should consider establishing a robust counterparty risk evaluation framework that considers of a range of risk factors. These include monitoring realised and unrealised profit and loss (P&L) for each counterparty, credit rating from reputable rating agencies, credit default swaps as well as regular counterparty review and monitoring activities.
In addition to reviewing and assessing the counterparty risks, the recent banking crisis events also highlight the importance of establishing a robust FX execution contingency plan that takes into account of legal and operational complexities.
If the counterparty becomes unavailable, the firm should be able to quickly and efficiently manage the existing FX trades (by way of novation, close-out or to implement Net Present Value (NPV) any future profits) and implement new FX trades as required by the business.
MillTechFX by Millennium Global is the FinTech affiliate of Millennium Global Investments, one of the largest specialist currency managers globally.
Our multi-bank market not only can help firms significantly reduce both FX costs and operational burden associated with FX execution and rolling hedging requirements, but also significantly reduces counterparty risks. This is because we offer multiple arrangements with tier one banks (if available) within a rigorous MillTechFX counterparty onboarding and monitoring framework
We provide access to a transparent marketplace for comparative FX execution from up to 15 counterparty banks, while harnessing a unique and significant pricing efficiency for our clients In addition, MillTechFX provides clients with full transparency of execution via independent TCA reporting.
Get in touch today to find out more.
Justin Xu, Head of Risk
Justin has over 10 years experience in FX risk management space and has held various positions in risk management, quantitative investment management as well as global macro trading. Currently, Justin works as the Head of Risk at MillTechFX, overseeing the implementation of enterprise risk framework in the firm. Prior to this, Justin worked as a Lecturer in Financial Economics at the University of Glasgow and held a PhD in financial econometrics from the University of Lancaster.